The Works of Marx and Engels in Ethnology Compared Introduction: Marx and Engels in Their General Relations
نویسنده
چکیده
The separation of the contributions to the theory and practice of socialism by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels was not seriously posited during their lifetimes, but only in the following generation. The separation, as opposed to the contributions of their entire working lives, of the respective quality of thinking in either case, was a matter of which Engels was conscious, for he wrote: "Marx was a genius, we others were at best talents. Without him the theory today would be far from what it is. Therefore it rightly bears his name." The evaluation by Engels of the relation between the two was duly repeated by their biographers. Mehring wrote: "There is no doubt that Marx was philosophically the greater of the two and that his brain was more highly trained." Mayer compared the two: "Marx was driven by the harsh goad of genius; Engels lived under the gentler domination of his rich humanity." Ryazanov simply posited that the collaboration of the two and their mutual support proceeded in perfect harmony, with the minor thesis of Engels's supportive role. Both Mehring and Ryazanov cited Engels's own words of modesty quoted above. Auguste Cornu has written with reference to the beginning of the collaboration: "Engels' study of the origin of communism was more on the economic and social level than on the philosophical and political plane, and portrayed it as a necessary product of the development of capitalist society. This lent definition to Marx's still theoretical
منابع مشابه
Johann Baptist von Schweitzer: the queer Marx loved to hate.
Despite his conviction on a morals charge involving a boy, the early German Social Democrat Johann Baptist von Schweitzer went on to have a successful political career. His life furnishes the context to present remarks by his political opponents Marx and Engels, which reveal their deep-seated homophobia. It is pointed out that this has been glossed over by the translations of the recently publi...
متن کاملEconomic Organization, Distribution and the Equality Issue: The Marx-Engels Perspective
This paper has four related themes. It demonstrates that Marx’s Communism in its first or Socialist phase would recognize the essential inequality of labour on grounds of efficiency and growth. It offers an explanation for the apparent paradox that Marx and Engels championed a fully-fledged control system notwithstanding appreciation of the allocation functions of a competitive market system. I...
متن کامل“ Science of Natural Processes ” by Frederick Engels
About the author. . . . Frederick Engels (1820-1895), as the son of a German textile manufacturer who owned factories in England, became so concerned about fate of textile workers he published The Condition of the Working Classes in England. He saw the textile worker as a new societal force leading to a rational ordering of social life, superseding capitalism. In collaboration with Karl Marx, E...
متن کاملErnst Mayr Roots of Dialectical Materialism
I have been as puzzled about this comment as Zavadsky was about my writings. What I was puzzled about was, which of my ideas or concepts were considered by Zavadsky to be so close to those of the dialectical materialists. I have been wondering about this for the past 30 years and I think I have gradually come close to an answer. In this I have been helped by a number of publications, particular...
متن کاملMarx as Moralist and Antimoralist Notes for Philosophy 166 Spring, 2006
1. The Problem. Marx is undeniably a fierce critic of a capitalist organization of economic activity. By what standards does Marx assess capitalism and find it objectionable? In many passages it seems that Marx's critique is based upon notions of justice and fairness which in his opinion capitalism flagrantly fails to satisfy. In the "Communist Manifesto," contrasting the phenomenon of exploita...
متن کامل